Manual review hides risk
Engineers can spend time searching through individual reports instead of seeing the bigger picture across layers, sections and alignments.
New Zealand-made test evidence visibility for roading and infrastructure teams
Make pavement and geotechnical test evidence easier to review, prove and act on.
Testbed turns buried test reports into clear, searchable evidence so roading teams can see what passed, what failed, where issues are appearing, and whether remedial work has resolved them.
- Better visibility across project testing
- More confidence in compliance review
- Faster access to evidence hidden in reports
Conceptual evidence view
Alignment A03 / Pavement Layer
Review support
Chainage
Test
Layer
Result
1,240m
Density
Basecourse
Pass
1,410m
Scala
Subgrade
Review
1,590m
Compaction
Fill
Fail
The problem
Important test evidence is often there. It is just too hard to see clearly.
Large roading projects can generate thousands of pavement and geotechnical tests across reports, forms, spreadsheets and PDFs. When results are buried in manual review, it becomes harder to spot failures, missed issues and patterns across the work.
Data capture is slow
Manual forms and re-entry into spreadsheets or systems can delay access to the evidence teams need while the work continues to move forward.
Failures are hard to assess
When criteria, locations and results are disconnected, it is difficult to quickly understand what passed, what failed and where attention is needed.
What Testbed does
From scattered reports to structured test evidence.
Testbed helps roading and infrastructure teams bring test evidence into one reviewable view. Reports can be uploaded, key values extracted, criteria applied and results mapped back to the road alignment.
It is built to support engineering review, not replace it. Teams can check extracted information, define the criteria that matter and use the evidence to support clearer compliance conversations.
Upload reports
Bring manual reports and scanned test evidence into the review process.
Extract values
Turn report content into structured evidence that can be checked, searched and reviewed.
Apply criteria
Evaluate tests against project, layer, section or alignment requirements.
How it works
A clearer path from test report to project visibility.
-
1
Upload test reports
Start with the reports teams already receive from testing activity.
-
2
Extract key values into structured evidence
Convert buried report content into searchable, reviewable test data.
-
3
Define project-specific criteria
Set the thresholds that matter for each test, layer, section or project requirement.
-
4
Review pass/fail results
Quickly see where results meet criteria, fail criteria or need engineering review.
-
5
Map issues to the road alignment
Understand exactly where quality issues are appearing across the work.
-
6
Track retesting and change over time
See whether remedial work has resolved the issue and where further attention is needed.
Core capabilities
Built around how engineers review test evidence.
Testbed focuses on the practical steps between receiving test reports and understanding what the evidence says about the project.
Report upload and extraction
Upload manual reports and extract the values needed for checking, searching and review.
Criteria-based evaluation
Define the rules that matter by test type, layer, section, alignment or project requirement.
Pass, fail and review status
Highlight results that meet criteria, miss criteria or need further engineering attention.
Road alignment mapping
Map test evidence back to the alignment so issue locations are easier to understand.
Focused filtering
Filter by the details that matter, including test type, chainage, layer, alignment or extracted fields.
Retesting visibility
Track whether remedial work and retesting have resolved the original issue.
Road alignment visibility
See where issues are forming, not just that they exist.
A failed result is more useful when teams can see where it sits in relation to the road, the layer, the section and the surrounding evidence.
Testbed is designed to help teams move from isolated test records to a clearer project-level view of quality evidence.
42
Tests reviewed
35
Passing
5
Review
2
Failing
Example only. Final project evidence remains subject to engineering review and verification.
Who it is for
For teams responsible for proving, reviewing and understanding roading test evidence.
Roading engineers
Review test evidence against the requirements that matter for the project.
Geotechnical engineers
Understand how test data relates to ground conditions, layers and locations.
Quality engineers
Define criteria, monitor failed results and support compliance review.
Engineering consultancies
Give project teams better access to evidence across complex works.
Infrastructure project teams
Surface issues earlier and support clearer conversations between parties.
Asset owners
Gain better visibility into the evidence behind handover, maintenance and future risk.
Product walkthrough
See the product story in context.
The walkthrough introduces the core problem: roading projects generate large volumes of test evidence, and teams need a clearer way to review, assess and map the results.
Designed for careful review
Decision support, not decision replacement.
Testbed is designed to make test evidence easier to access, check and understand. It helps teams surface results and evaluate them against defined criteria, while leaving engineering judgement where it belongs: with qualified people.
Extracted information should be reviewed and verified as part of the normal project evidence process.
FAQ
Questions engineers are likely to ask.
What is Testbed?
Testbed is an engineering evidence and test-result visibility platform for roading and infrastructure projects. It helps teams upload reports, structure test evidence, evaluate results against criteria and map issues to the road alignment.
Who is Testbed for?
It is designed for roading engineers, geotechnical engineers, quality engineers, engineering consultancies, infrastructure project teams and asset owners who need clearer visibility of test evidence.
Does Testbed replace engineering judgement?
No. Testbed supports engineering review by making evidence easier to find, check, compare and understand. It does not replace qualified engineering judgement.
Does Testbed make automatic compliance decisions?
No. Testbed evaluates results against criteria defined by the project team and highlights pass, fail or review status. Final interpretation and action remain with the project team.
What kinds of reports can Testbed support?
Testbed is designed around the kinds of manual reports, scanned documents, forms and PDFs commonly produced during pavement and geotechnical testing workflows.
Can results be mapped to the road alignment?
Yes. A key purpose of Testbed is to help teams see where results and issues are appearing in relation to the road alignment, section, layer and surrounding evidence.
Can teams define their own criteria?
Yes. Engineers can define the criteria that matter for each test, layer, section, alignment or project requirement.
Can Testbed help with retesting and remedial work visibility?
Yes. Testbed is designed to help teams track whether later testing and remedial work have resolved the original issue or whether further attention is needed.
How do I book a demo?
Use the form below and the Testbed team will contact you about a product walkthrough.
Book a demo
See how Testbed can support your testing evidence workflow.
Share a few details and we will contact you about a product walkthrough focused on roading and infrastructure test evidence.
Report upload
Criteria review
Pass/fail visibility
Road alignment mapping
Request a product walkthrough
Submit your details and we’ll contact you about a product walkthrough. Your information will only be used to respond to your enquiry.